by Ian Williams Goddard
by Ian Williams Goddard
The antianxiety drug buspirone is favored for anxious patients with Alzheimer's disease (AD) because it is less sedating than the benzodiazepine tranquilizers, which may worsen cognitive impairment. But how safe is buspirone for AD patients? A review of medical research finds several prominent similarities between AD pathology and buspirone pharmacology, raising concerns that buspirone could augment cognitive decline in AD.
Alzheimer's disease (AD) is the most common form of dementia, afflicting approximately four million people in the U.S. alone (Alzheimer's Association, 1999). AD occurs primarily in the elderly, manifesting itself initially as mild cognitive impairment (MCI) and progressing eventually to profound dementia.
The purpose of this report is to address possible dangers regarding the use of the drug buspirone by AD patients. Buspirone, marketed as an "antianxiety" drug, is pharmacologically distinct from the benzodiazepines, the most widely prescribed antianxiety and tranquilizing drugs. Buspirone is often recommended for AD patients because it is less sedating than the benzodiazepines (Cummings, 1998). Buspirone has also been shown to cause less cognitive impairment in healthy subjects than the benzodiazepines (Unrug-Neervoort, van Luijtelaar, & Coenen, 1992). Nevertheless, buspirone suppresses neurological function and interferes with communication between brain cells, primarily in a region of the brain known as the hippocampus--a fact that signals possible danger for AD patients.
The hippocampus is central to memory functions (Marieb, 1992) and is a primary site of AD-associated pathology (Laakso, 1996; Small, 1999). AD-induced hippocampal degradation is manifested as a reduction of neuronal activity in the hippocampus, which may be the initial onset pathology of AD (Salehi, Ravid, Gonatas, & Swaab, 1995; Swaab et al., 1998).
In light of the above, it is noteworthy that buspirone has been shown to systematically reduce neuronal activity in the hippocampus (Hiner, Mauk, Peroutka, & Kocsis, 1988; Mauk, Peroutka, & Kocsis, 1988; Peroutka, Mauk, & Kocsis, 1987; Tada et al., 1999). Buspirone-induced hippocampal suppression has also been shown to increase during chronic exposure, which may contribute to the delayed onset of its therapeutic effect (O'Conner, Rowan, & Anwyl, 1993). This is significant, for if hippocampal suppression is involved in the therapeutic mechanism of buspirone, then, if doctors determine that the drug is working, it is probable that hippocampal suppression would be occurring. In short, consistent with Peter Breggin's first principle of brain-disabling treatments (Breggin, 1997), the evidence suggests that brain impairment and "therapeutic effect" may be the same thing.
It is worth observing that evidence suggests that marijuana impairs memory by suppressing neuronal activity in the hippocampus (Heyser, Hampson, & Deadwyler, 1993). Establishing a consistent correlation between hippocampal suppression and memory impairment, buspirone has been shown to impair memory in both animals and humans (Bass, Means, & McMillen, 1992; Holland, Wesnes, & Dietrich, 1994; Liang, 1999; Liang, Tsui, Tyan, & Chiang, 1998; Rowan, Cullen, & Moulton, 1990; Sellers, Schneiderman, Romach, Kaplan, & Somer, 1992; Unrug-Neervoort et al., 1992; Wada & Fukuda, 1992; Winsauer, Rodriguez, Cha, & Moerschbaecher, 1999).
Sellers and colleagues (1992) found that a single dose of buspirone, equal to one third the maximum recommended daily intake, caused significant memory impairment in healthy subjects. Holland and associates (1994) found that a therapeutic dose of buspirone adversely affected a range of cognitive tests including logical reasoning in healthy subjects. It should be noted that the elderly and ill are more vulnerable than the young and healthy to the cognitive-impairing effects of drugs (Moore & O'Keeffe, 1999).
It has also been shown that (a) buspirone reduces serotonin in the hippocampus (Sharp, McQuade, Bramwell, & Hjorth, 1993), and AD is associated with reduced serotonin in the hippocampus (Baker & Reynolds, 1989); (b) buspirone reduces the number of active B-HT1A serotonin receptors in the hippocampus (Sharp et al., 1993), and AD is associated with a reduced number of active 5-HT1A receptors in the hippocampus (Winter & Petti, 1987); (c) buspirone increases the hormone cortisol (Meltzer & Maes, 1994), and increases of cortisol correspond with increased cognitive impairment in AD (Carlson, Sherwin, & Chertkow, 1999; Miller et al., 1998; Weiner, Vobach, Olsson, Svetlik, & Risser, 1997).
To summarize, research indicates that both Alzheimer's Disease and buspirone appear to share at least five common effects:
1. impairment of memory
The evidence therefore suggests that the use of buspirone by AD patients could promote those deleterious effects of AD. More specifically, since at least points 1 through 4 above are linked to the "therapeutic" effect of buspirone, the effectiveness of buspirone treatment appears to rest on the occurrence of AD-like effects. Because there appears to be little or no research on the cognitive impact of buspirone in AD patients, extrapolation based upon known effects of buspirone may be the best method of risk assessment at this time.
The danger remains that in AD patients, drug-induced cognitive impairments will go unnoticed due to their similarity to AD pathology. This emphasizes the wisdom of minimizing or ideally avoiding the use in AD patients of any drugs that are even mildly deleterious to cognitive function.
Alzheimer's Association. (1999). The facts, statistics / prevalence. Available: www.alz.org.
Baker, G. B., & Reynolds, G. P. (1989). Biogenic amines and their metabolites in Alzheimer's disease Noradrenaline, 5-hydroxytryptamine and 5- hydroxyindole-3-acetic acid depleted in hippocampus but not in substantia innominata. Neuroscience Letters, 100, 335-339.
Carlson, L. E., Sherwin, B. B., & Chertkow, H. M. (1999). Relationships between dehydroepiandrosterone sulfate (DHEAS) and cortisol (CRT) plasma levels and everyday memory in Alzheimer's disease patients compared to healthy controls. Hormones and Behavior, 35, 254-263.
Heyser, C. J., Hampson, R. E., & Deadwyler, S. A. (1993). Effects of delta-9 tetrahvdrocannabinol on delayed match to sample performance in rats Alterations in short-term memory associated with changes in task specific firing of hippocampal cells. Journal of Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics, 264, 294-307.
Liang, K. C., Tsui, K. Y., Tyan, Y. M., & Chiang, T. C. (1998). Buspirone impaired acquisition and retention in avoidance tasks: involvement of the hippocampus. Chinese Journal of Physiology, 41, 33-44.
Liang, K. C. (1999). Pre- or posttraining injection of buspirone impaired retention in the inhibitory avoidance task Involvement of amygdala &HT1A receptors. European Journal of Neuroscience, 11, 1491-1500.
Marieb, E. (1992). Human anatomy and physiology (pp. 491-492). Redwood City, CA Benjamin/Cummings.
Miller, T. P., Taylor, J., Rogerson, S., Mauricio, M., Kennedy, Q., Schatzberg, A., Tinklenberg, J., & Yesavage, J. (1998). Cognitive and noncognitive symptoms in dementia patients Relationship to cortisol and dehydroepiandrosterone. International Psychogeriatrics, 10, 85-96.
O'Connor, J. J., Rowan, M. J., & Anwyl, R. (1993). Use-dependent effects of acute and chronic treatment with imipramine and buspirone on excitatory synaptic transmission in the rat hippocampus in vive. Naunyn- Schmiedebergs Archives of Pharmacology, 348, 158-163.
Peroutka, S. J., Mauk, M. D., & Kocsis, J. D. (1987). Modulation of neuronal activity in the hippocampus by 5-hydroxytryptamine and 5- hydroxytryptaminelA selective drugs. Neuropharmacology, 26, 139-146.
Salehi, A., Ravid, R., Gonatas, N. K., & Swaab, D. F. (1995). Decreased activity of hippocampal neurons in Alzheimer's disease is not related to the presence of neurofibrillary tangles. Journal of Neuropathology and Experimental Neurology, 54, 704-709.
Sellers, E. M., Schneiderman, J. F., Romach, M. K., Kaplan, H. L., & Somer, G. R. (1992). Comparative drug effects and abuse liability of lorazepam, buspirone, and secobarbital in nondependent subjects. Journal of Clinical Psychopharmacology, 12, 79-85.
Sharp, T., McQuade, R., Bramwell, S., & Hjorth, S. (1993). Effect of acute and repeated administration of 5-HT1A receptor agonists on 5-HT release in rat brain in vivo. Naunyn-Schmiedebergs Archive of Pharmacology, 348, 339-346.
Swaab, D. F., Lucassen, P. J., Salehi, A., Scherder, E. J., van Someren, E. J., & Verwer R. W. (1998). Reduced neuronal activity and reactivation in Alzheimer's's disease. Progress in Brain Research, 117, 343-377.
Tada, K., Kasamo, K., Ueda, N., Suzuki, T., Kojima, T., & Ishikawa, K. (1999). Anxiolytic 5-hydroxytryptamine 1A agonists suppress firing activity of dorsal hippocampus CA1 pyramidal neurons through a postsynaptic mechanism Single-unit study in unanesthetized, unrestrained rats. Journal of Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics, 288, 843-848.
Unrug-Neervoort, A., van Luijtelaar, G., & Coenen, A. (1992). Cognition and vigilance differential effects of diazepam and buspirone on memory and psychomotor performance. Neuropsychobiology, 26, 146-150.
Winsauer, P. J., Rodriguez, F. H., Cha, A. E., & Moerschbaecher, J. M. (1999). Full and partial 5-HT1A receptor agonists disrupt learning and performance in rats. Journal of Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics, 288, 335-347.
Winter, J. C., & Petti, D. T. (1987). The effects of 8-hydroxy-2-(di-n-propylamino) tetralin and other serotonergic agonists on performance in a radial maze A possible role for bHT1A receptors in memory. Pharmacology, Biochemistry, and Behavior, 27, 625-628.
(c) 2000 Springer Publishing Company